One-to-Many Bargaining with Endogenous Protocol
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper studies the bargaining between one central player and N peripheral players. In each period the central player chooses which peripheral player to bargain with, hence the bargaining protocol is endogenously determined. The peripheral players are heterogeneous in terms of their bargaining power. We characterize the set of equilibrium outcomes with two different types of contracts, namely, contingent contract and cash-offer contract. It is shown that different bargaining protocols may arise in equilibria sustaining different agreements. The central player can play off the weaker peripheral player against the stronger peripheral players. When the players become extremely patient, the central player’s equilibrium payoff can be arbitrarily close to what he can obtain in a bilateral bargaining with only the weakest peripheral player. JEL-codes: C78.
منابع مشابه
Measuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملMeasuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملOn the Convergence to the Nash Bargaining Solution for Endogenous Bargaining Protocols
We consider non-cooperative multilateral bargaining games with endogenous bargaining protocols. Under an endogenous protocol, the probability with which a player becomes the proposer in a round of bargaining depends on the identity of the player who previously rejected. An important example is the frequently studied rejector-becomes-proposer protocol. We focus on subgame perfect equilibria in s...
متن کاملEndogenous assembly rules, senior agenda power, and incumbency advantage∗
We study repeated legislative bargaining in an assembly that chooses its bargaining rules endogenously, and whose members face an election after each legislative term. An agenda protocol or bargaining rule assigns to each legislator a probability of being recognized to make a policy proposal in the assembly. We predict that the agenda protocol chosen in equilibrium disproportionately favors mor...
متن کاملExtending Alternating-Offers Bargaining in One-to-Many and Many-to-Many Settings
Automating negotiations in markets where multiple buyers and sellers operate is a scientific challenge of extraordinary importance. One-to-one negotiations are classically studied as bilateral bargaining problems, while one-to-many and many-to-many negotiations are studied as auctioning problems. This paper aims at bridging together these two approaches, analyzing agents’ strategic behavior in ...
متن کامل